October 2, 2007 — Volume 9, Number 20 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1.
FEATURE STORY: An employee showing up to work wearing a baseball cap, in violation of your company's dress code, is one thing. It's easy enough to tell the hat-wearing employee, "Don't do it again," expect a little resistance, and then compliance. An employee wearing a headscarf due to a religious observance when any type of head covering is prohibited is entirely another dress code dilemma. Not as easy is telling a headscarf-wearing employee to remove it without risking a potential religious discrimination lawsuit. Take Alamo Rent-A-Car, for example. It previously allowed a Muslim employee to wear a headscarf at work. The company found a happy medium between her religious beliefs and its dress code by requiring her to wear one that had its logo because she interacted with the public as a customer sales representative. However, following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the company refused to allow the employee to observe the religious requirement at all by demanding her to remove the headscarf when assisting customers. It fired her when she refused to comply. With the EEOC's help, the employee sued the company for religious discrimination. Earlier this year, a jury awarded her over $287,000 for her claim. (EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLC, D.C. AZ, No. CIV 02-1908-PHX-ROS, 2007) Public Image Concerns If your organization is concerned with the effect on public image an employee's religious requirement might have, you may compromise by asking the employee to pin the company logo to the item in question, or to wear the religious garb in a particular color scheme. UPS, for example, accommodates a variety of religious beliefs by offering brown turbans, longer shorts, culottes, and headscarves. It is possible to make modifications to dress standards without affecting public image. To help determine whether an employee's request for a dress code exception is legitimate, or whether your denial of the request is reasonable, take the following steps.
There are instances where the effect on public image creates an undue hardship. Only then may your company have a legal leg to stand on in refusing to alter the company's dress code for an employee's religious observance. However, the burden is on the company to prove:
Dress code dilemmas and other difficult workplace situations, such as harassment and low morale, will be addressed in a web conference on Effectively Managing The Ten Most Disruptive Workplace Situations on October 4, 2007. |
||||||
|
||||||
2. CATHIE'S CORNER: A colleague who was starting a new job asked for advice on where to start getting acclimated in her new employer's policies. I generally perform an HR audit when I start in a new office, and the most important thing to me is to establish that your new employer is compliant with all the major employment laws. I reviewed with her some of the issues I like to cover first.
These are just a few of the items you will want to be sure you are comfortable with. They are not the only ones. What takes precedence will depend on your corporate culture and, to a certain extent, the needs and wishes of your employer. Some will want you to completely overhaul the system immediately; others will fiercely resist any thoughts of change. I don't recommend change for the sake of change. If the systems are working and your audit reflects that, there's no reason to alter them. If you find changes that are necessary, it may take a bit of tact to persuade upper management of the need to adopt your procedures. And, frankly, some battles you will not win, so pick them carefully. One final thought: HR audits need not be restricted to only when you are new to a company. It can't hurt to review your policies periodically regardless of how long you've been with the employer, simply due to changes in law and procedure. There's always something you can do to improve! Catherine Bannon is the President of HR by Request, Inc., in Marshfield, MA (catherine.bannon@gmail.com). Bannon worked for 10 years in HR management before starting her consulting firm. |
||||||
| 3. | ||||||
How long must an employer wait to replace a fired employee without raising the stink of discrimination? Is one month long enough? Should it be at least six months? There's no magic number, but...View the full story on our website. |
||||||
FREE REPORT Check out the new Free Report, " Domestic Violence Isn't So Domestic After All," which explores what you and your staff should do should a domestic violence issue arise in your workplace. You get legal and practical pointers, as well as a sample policy and a role-playing scenario that you can incorporate into a management training session. |
||||||
TOP
5 RESOURCES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONALS |
||||||
|
||||||
Copyright © 2007 by Alexander Hamilton Institute, Inc. Employment Law Resource Center at www.ahipubs.com emailnewsletters@ahipubs.com (800) 879-2441 • 70 Hilltop Road • Ramsey, NJ 07446 |
||||||